Asked by Newsmax why the Biden administration did not arrest the January 6 pipe bomber, Rudy Giuliani says “they orchestrated this”
Published
Citation
From the December 4, 2025, edition of Newsmax's Carl Higbie Frontline
LIDIA CURANAJ (HOST): No. What do you think about — you got Pam Bondi and you got Kash Patel saying that nothing new came in, that the evidence was just there collecting dust. Why would the Biden administration not arrest somebody? I mean, we're talking about these were operable. These were working pipe bombs. Thousands of people could have been killed, injured. Why? Why didn't they make an arrest? And it took it took this this DOJ ten months to do it?
RUDY GIULIANI (GUEST): I had no doubt from the night that it happened, they orchestrated this. And they don't want you to find that out. This was an antifa Democrat Party orchestrated protest that they turned into a riot in order to try to destroy Donald J. Trump. This was their final effort.
I mean, they did everything else to him, right? They impeached him twice or they were going to impeach him another time. They made up lies about him. They framed him for crimes. They paid over a million dollars to create a totally fictitious Russian collusion story that they sold to a crooked media for years. They extraordinarily were able to cover up unbelievable evidence of crime by Biden, which they're still covering up. No one really knows that Biden got $21 million from Red China, or that he gave up the Bagram air base. And unless you're a fool, there's got to be a connection between the two. You don't give up an air base 400 miles from China and get $20 million from China, and then not be a connection from it unless you think I'm a fool. So there's so much to this, Lidia. They can't let any of it come come undone. Otherwise, you're going to find out that this was another one of their plots to try to destroy Donald Trump.
Now, who is this guy? Yes. There are indications online that he is — his parents are Democrats. They made contributions to the Democratic Party. There are indications online that he's a anti-Trump extremist. But they're not telling you that. If you were to go on ChatGPT or you even go on a Musk service, they refuse to tell you that even though I can go find the articles. I mean, I'm not any better than artificial intelligence, right?
CURANAJ: Right.
GIULIANI: They must be cutting. They must be cutting it off. But it's there. It's right there. He was considered a — an anarchist is the word that's used most often in the descriptions of him that you can find if you go investigate.
CURANAJ: Right. Even the Washington Post said he was extreme in his political views. But then they stopped short of saying what those political views were. And then we also know the affidavit showing that the suspect's sneakers, limited edition Nike sneakers — only a few people had these sneakers. So you're also a former federal prosecutor. You've investigated many, many, many, probably thousands of cases. So there were so many clues that could have led right to this guy. And so —
GIULIANI: No. No question this would have been so easy to solve. They didn't do it on purpose. And there's a reason they do it on purpose. There's more to it than we know right now. There's a reason they didn't want to get to him because getting to him would open something up. Now, it wouldn't be unusual as part of the Democratic scheme with antifa, which is what this was going back to October, if not August of the election year. They — there's evidence they were planning this way back in August of the election year. There are people who are willing to testify to that. And just think of that. There's a piece of paper that says there were 250 plus antifa people in that gathering. They've never made an attempt to identify a single one of them. They're using face imaging to get a 75 year-old lady but not some antifa guy that's banging the door down. Who were the two guys banging down the door of Pelosi?