Last weekend, Joe diGenova — a GOP lawyer who represented Donald Trump in his bogus election fraud cases in 2020 and a longtime fixture in right-wing media — was appointed to a role of overseeing a planned investigation into Trump’s political enemies.
The right-wing media reception to diGenova’s appointment has been strangely mixed. While Newsmax hosts celebrated his appointment, their counterparts on Fox News — which apparently banned diGenova from appearing on the network years ago — have mentioned the news just one time, in passing, on Sunday afternoon.
diGenova has regularly appeared on Newsmax in recent years. After he received his new appointment, hosts like Greg Kelly celebrated, saying, “One of our favorite guests on this show will be a counselor to the attorney general.” Fellow host Carl Higbie also touted the news. But while Newsmax’s stars throw a parade over diGenova’s appointment, their Fox counterparts have been largely silent.
Fox is in a strained position, because while the network spent years feverishly demanding and supporting the prosecutions of Trump’s enemies over dubious premises, its leaders are seemingly also aware that diGenova is not credible. In 2018 and 2019, diGenova made more than 100 appearances on Fox News and Fox Business. But both networks appear to have banned him in late 2019. He has not appeared on a Fox News weekday program since October 8, 2019. In February 2020, The Daily Beast reported on an internal Fox News research briefing book detailing the “unrelenting disinformation campaign” in which diGenova and his wife, Victoria Toensing, played “notable roles." (You may recall that the same Fox News research credibly cited Media Matters.)
As Matt Gertz concludes:
Now someone Fox’s own research division panned for “spreading disinformation” will be running the Trump administration’s latest efforts to criminalize their opponents. The network has spent years feeding the flames of the conspiracy theories that diGenova will now be investigating — but highlighting his new role might force the network to confront what it means that someone it’s apparently deemed unreliable is leading that charge.
Read the whole piece here.