From the April 5 edition of Fox News' Outnumbered:
Loading the player reg...
ANDREA TANTAROS (HOST): I am borderline singularly obsessed with this story. It was over 150 members of the intelligence community, Harris, that stood up and said for the last eight years we have been pressured to fudge the intel, to scrub the report so that the threat of ISIS is gone. Why would the administration give cover to ISIS? Is it about his legacy? Some people are asking the question, is he covering for ISIS? Why would the administration be pressuring these agents do not give us the facts on the ground? And we see this is an administration that is not above censoring out radical Islamic jihadism from a speech with the French president. And this is a bigger push, and it's a bigger story the media isn't covering. Who are they going to replace these intelligence agents with? There has been a move by the Intel community to replace the analysts and the agents with progressives. So, I want to know, who is going to replace these two people that say they are being retaliated against? If I had to guess, it's two political appointees that will write a progressive story line.