Matthews: "[L]ow 30 percent" result in Iowa for Clinton would mean “reject[ion] ... by two-thirds” of Iowa Dems
Elections
-
-
On Hannity & Colmes, Luntz misrepresented Edwards comment about campaign finances
-
Taking lead from Drudge, conservative echo chamber hypes Clinton photo
-
During Giuliani interview, Hannity again failed to disclose reported appearance at Giuliani fundraiser
-
MSNBC's Hall referred to McCain and Lieberman as “maverick[s]”
-
Wash. Post's Balz asserted Giuliani "[a]t odds" with GOP “on abortion, guns and gays,” despite moving to the right on those issues
-
Politico called Clinton's Sunday-show laugh “calculated” and a “cackle,” but Giuliani's laugh “good-natured[]”
-
Ignoring polling to the contrary, Ignatius asserted there's a “nagging uneasiness” about having both Clintons back in the White House
-
Matthews and guests lauded Romney's “Faith in America” speech, ignored attack on “secularism”
-
Drudge headline falsely asserted, “Edwards Slams Oprah”
-
On Reliable Sources, Cullum claimed questions about where Obama's “religion lies, where his loyalty lies” could “backfire on Oprah”
-
CNN's Cooper praised Huckabee's failure to answer WWJD question as “probably one of the best answers you could possibly come up to”
-
During Dem debate coverage, will CNN's Campbell Brown disclose her husband's role in Romney's campaign?
-
On Special Report, Barone cited interest-group spending to explain defeat of conservative initiative, but not liberal one
-
NY Times again falsely suggested that any Dem is saying Clinton should be treated differently from her male rivals
-
Politico claimed "[o]ther recent polls ... placed Giuliani ahead of Clinton" but did not report which ones
-
Discussing how Bill Clinton may affect 2008 election, Amy Holmes cited May 2005 poll
-
NY Times' Healy, USA Today advanced myth that Clinton switched baseball allegiances