Journal Ed. Report selectively quoted Clinton to claim she is “disingenuous” and “supported the war” in 2004
-
-
Wash. Post's Balz alleged “Clinton fatigue” but did not quote anyone tired of Clintons
-
ABC's Raddatz baselessly claimed that national security seems “a bit of a foreign language” for Democrats
-
Media echoed, applauded Giuliani's distortion of Paul's comments about 9-11 attacks
-
Wash. Post's Romano challenged Matthews on his “obsession” with Clinton marriage “logistics”
-
NBC's Reid reported McCain's blast of Dems for “no” vote on troop funding, but not McCain's prior “no” vote
-
Hannity suggested Edwards' “primping” is evidence that he does not “understand[] the nature of the battle in the war that's being waged against us”
-
Media advanced McCain's false “flak” attack on Obama
-
Gerth and Van Natta falsely claim Clinton did not speak about terror before 9-11
-
Wash. Post reported that Thompson sees himself as “antidote to Washington politics,” ignoring his history of playing politics
-
Matthews repeated disputed claim about Sen. Clinton's presidential ambitions
-
Months after “Last word,” Insight offered another bogus, contradictory defense of Obama-madrassa story
-
Washingtonpost.com's O'Keefe: “I don't necessarily know what” Obama campaign would want him to cover
-
Hannity again selectively excerpted interview with Obama's pastor to claim church has “black-separatist agenda”
-
Fox & Friends guest claimed young voters “more conservative” on abortion, “racial preferences”
-
MSNBC, Fox News devoted far more time to Edwards' haircuts than to Domenici announcement
-
Despite past discussion on his show, Hannity claimed he had “never heard” Coulter call for Clinton assassination
-
CNN alleged “creative math” in Obama's fundraising before debunking the allegation