Prominent right-wing media figures have embraced regime collapse as a desirable, or at least acceptable, outcome of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. Although most of these commentators are light on specifics, in many cases they acknowledge that what they’re calling for is something that looks more like a failed state than a transitional government.
It’s important to get the terminology clear — the phrase “regime change” implies, falsely, that external powers can replace a perceived hostile government at will with few repercussions or challenges to the state's legitimacy. “Regime collapse,” however, dispenses with even that thin pretext. All that’s left is destruction for its own sake.
If right-wing pundits get their way and the U.S.-Israeli campaign collapses the government in Iran, the consequences would likely be disastrous for Iranians, the region, and the wider world. Already, some in conservative media are demanding the United States flood the country with small arms to incite a regime change or collapse, raising the risks of civil war in a country of more than 90 million people. If there is any country in the world that could benefit from plunging Iran into chaos, it’s Israel, which aims to remove Iran as a regional force that can resist its influence.
The conservative voices calling for regime collapse have largely abandoned any humanitarian pretexts for this war. They may yet get their wish for chaos and destruction.