Skip to main content
  • Online media
  • Tariffs
  • Epstein
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • RSS
  • Take Action
  • Search
  • Donate

Media Matters for America

  • News & Analysis
  • Research & Studies
  • Audio & Video
  • Archives

Media Matters for America

  • Nav
  • Search
  • News & Analysis
  • Research & Studies
  • Audio & Video
  • Archives
  • Online media
  • Tariffs
  • Epstein
  • Take Action
  • Search
  • Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • RSS

Tucker Carlson’s January 6 hearing counterprogramming was Fox’s attempt at self-preservation

Written by Nikki McCann Ramirez

Published 06/10/22 3:47 PM EDT

On Thursday night, as cable and broadcast networks switched their feeds to live coverage of the first public hearing by the House select committee investigating the January 6 insurrection, Fox News host Tucker Carlson opened the hour with a declaration that his show was “the only hour on an American news channel that will not be carrying their propaganda live.”

As the January 6 committee released disturbing new footage and revelations of the attack and its planning, Carlson aired a commercial-free hour recapping more than a year's worth of his network's revisionist agitprop surrounding the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Viewers were given what amounted to a stern reminder from Carlson that Fox had already told them what they needed to know about January 6, and he condemned the hearings as a show trial that ignored the real questions about the events. 

Those “real” questions constitute a contradictory, easily-debunked, and outright laughable set of claims Fox has presented to viewers as an alternate reality. That version exonerates both the network and Republican officials from their role in promoting false claims about the 2020 election — false claims that would result in a mob attempting to prevent, and succeeding in disrupting, the certification of Joe Biden as president-elect. 

Carlson and his guests claimed that the January 6 attack was “a forgettably minor” outbreak of violence. He hosted a white nationalist-affiliated conspiracy theorist who claimed January 6 was a “clear hoax.” Other guests, including right-wing pundit Ned Ryun, so-called “independent journalist” Michael Tracey, and former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, disparaged the hearings as illegitimate and a “show trial” while refusing to engage with the substance. 

The committee revealed evidentiary texts between Fox host Sean Hannity and former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany coordinating a media strategy in response to the attack. During the discussion of the texts, the Fox broadcast zoomed in on the committee dais as Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) addressed the committee, while Carlson blasted other networks for airing “unfiltered propaganda.”

At its core, Fox's refusal to engage with the hearings is an act of self-preservation. The style of coverage fits a pattern for Carlson and the network, as I have previously written. Carlson has thrown a mess of misinformation — conspiracy-mongering, minimization, and obfuscation — at the insurrection in the hopes of delegitimizing any serious inquiry into the events of that day. In the 18 months since the attack, he has shifted from condemning the violence to downplaying the insurrection as nothing more than “elderly people [who] showed up with signs,” to producing a three-part torture-porn series calling the attack a “false flag.”

The network had a clear role in the propagation of President Donald Trump’s claims of election fraud. The Murdochs are no strangers to putting a blindfold on their viewers in favor of protecting their bottom line, and Fox understands that delegitimizing any attempt at inquiry into the factors that fomented the violent culmination of January 6 is also a mechanism for protecting the network itself from scrutiny. 

The Latest

  1. Matt Walsh on Alex Pretti: “You deserved it. You quite literally had it coming.”

    Video & Audio 01/28/26 2:55 PM EST

  2. Tim Pool on conspiracy theories about the assault on Rep. Ilhan Omar: “The right doesn't care if she did or did not” stage the attack. “They're gonna say she did.”

    Video & Audio 01/28/26 2:40 PM EST

  3. Nick Fuentes praises Steve Bannon's rhetoric on ramping up deportations and ICE operations

    Video & Audio 01/28/26 1:23 PM EST

  4. Ben Shapiro: “Nothing has actually changed in terms of the operations that ICE is slated to perform in Minneapolis. The president has shifted around some faces.”

    Video & Audio 01/28/26 12:35 PM EST

  5. Steve Bannon calls for Trump to “raise the temperature” in Minneapolis: “You're gonna have to round up some 5-year-olds with their parents”

    Video & Audio 01/28/26 11:46 AM EST

Pagination

  • Current page 1
  • …
  • Next page ››

In This Article

  • January 6 Insurrection

    jan 6
  • Fox News

    Fox-News-MMFA-Tag.png
  • Tucker Carlson

    Tucker-Carlson-MMFA-Tag.png

Related

  1. Watch MSNOW's Ari Melber discuss Fox News' changing narrative on ICE shootings in Minnesota

    Video & Audio 01/27/26 7:18 PM EST

  2. Fox’s absurd attempt to cast Tom Homan as Trump’s good cop on immigration

    Article 01/27/26 4:03 PM EST

  3. Fox's Trey Gowdy calls out Noem for getting ahead of the facts: “I don't understand why it is so hard for those of us in public service to say from time to time, ‘You know what, I got it wrong'”

    Video & Audio 01/27/26 2:25 PM EST

Media Matters for America

Sign up for email updates
  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Submissions
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • RSS

© 2026 Media Matters for America

RSS