Wash Post Has Published At Least 70 Clinton Email Articles, Blog Posts, And Columns--Just This Month

In August, Post's Ingatius Explained Why The Controversy Is “Overstated”

The runaway coverage of Hillary Clinton's emails has become so expansive that it's often hard for news consumers to get their hands around how vast the ocean of media attention is. It's difficult to quantify how numbing the endless questions have become, and how painfully repetitive the bouts of analysis now are.

Lately though, we're starting to get some concrete data points. For instance, thanks to the broadcast evening news analysis of Andrew Tyndall we know that ABC World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, and NBC Nightly News this year have together spent just as much time covering the email controversy as they have spent covering Clinton's entire presidential campaign.

Additionally, Media Matters detailed how, since March, Washington Post political blogger Chris Cillizza has penned more than 50 posts mentioning Hillary Clinton's emails, nearly all of them featuring dire warnings about the supposedly “massive political problem” facing the Democrat.

It turns out Cillizza isn't alone at the Post. According to a search of the Nexis database, the Post has published at least 70 articles, columns, and blog posts this month that mention Clinton and discuss her emails at least three times.  

70, just this month.

In other words, the Post has roughly averaged more than two Clinton email missives every day in September. The newspaper's total word count for Clinton email coverage, in news and opinion, this month? According to Nexis word counts, approximately 60,000 words, which is about the equivalent of a 200-page hardcover book.

Just for the month of September.

Right now, the Post's relentless, breathless news and opinion coverage feels like Iran Contra-meets-Watergate, even though there's no indication any laws were broken in the Clinton saga. The ironic part is that in late August, Post columnist David Ignatius spelled out why the media fury surrounding the email story was “overstated.”  Most of the Post newsroom apparently ignored him for the month of September.

And keep in mind, this tsunami-type coverage comes six months after the email story first emerged.

Obviously this much saturation coverage produces almost comedic redundancies. Take for instance how the Post's news and opinion pages handled the apology Clinton offered up regarding her use of private emails:  

-Hillary Clinton apologizes for e-mail system: 'I take responsibility'

-Hillary Clinton finally apologizes for her private e-mail server. What took so long?

-Why Hillary Clinton apologized

-Hillary's apology won't make e-mail scandal go away

-Hillary Clinton's 'apology' interview, annotated

-Is Clinton's 'I'm sorry' TV tour enough to change her political fortunes?

Gee, think Post readers get the idea?

Like lots of news organizations, it seems the Post has decided to gorge itself on email coverage and use it as a permanent backdrop for the Clinton campaign.  For Republicans, that's a winning model. For voters in search of 2016 insights, not so much.