CNN's Stelter: Bret Baier Peddling "Indictment" Nonsense Was "More Than Just Inartful Language," It "Was Wrong"

CNN's Stelter: Bret Baier Peddling "Indictment" Nonsense Was "More Than Just Inartful Language," It "Was Wrong"

Brian Stelter: "There Is No Evidence That Any Of The Fox Stuff" About A Clinton Foundation Investigation Or Clinton Indictment "Is True" 

Video ››› ››› MEDIA MATTERS STAFF

From the November 4 edition of CNN's New Day

Loading the player reg...

BRIAN STELTER: Fox News [is] relying on anonymous sources inside the FBI and around the FBI to suggest that Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation are in imminent legal trouble. This report started on Wednesday. Really reflecting this divide, this war within the FBI. The initial report from Fox anchor Bret Baier was about the potential for indictments. Take a look at what he said on Wednesday.

[BEGIN VIDEO CLIP]

BRET BAIER: We talked to two separate sources with intimate knowledge of what's going on with these FBI investigations. The investigations will continue. There is a lot of evidence and barring some obstruction in some way, they believe they will continue to likely an indictment. 

[END VIDEO CLIP]

STELTER: This lit up the internet. The "I" word indictment. Countless conservative blogs and websites ran with this. Some started fantasizing about Clinton behind bars, about serious legal peril for Clinton and for the Foundation. But then on Thursday, he seemed to walk it back a bit. Here is what Baier said on Thursday morning. 

[BEGIN VIDEO CLIP]

​BAIER: I want to be clear about this and this came from a Q&A that I did with Brit Hume after my show and after we went through everything. I got to the end of that and ​said ​they have a lot of evidence that would likely lead to an indictment. But that's not -- that's inartfully answered. ​That's not the process, that's not how you do it. ​

[END VIDEO CLIP]

​STELTER: ​​This seemed ​more than just inartful ​language to me​. ​CNN's Evan Perez​, NBC, ABC​ ​all have said​ based​ on ​other ​anonymous sources​ that​ ​​there is no evidence ​that any ​of the Fox ​stuff is true. That there is nothing close to an indictment. In fact, it's pretty clear there's a battle inside the FBI. That's the real story here. 

ALISYN ​CAMEROTA (CO-HOST): Well, I mean, Bret is a real journalist.​ ​He's not Sean Hannity who as we've discussed is a broadcaster who just fell for a fake news story and printed it out on his radio show.​ Bret is a real journalist. ​So does that clarification go far enough? Was it inartful ​or was it wrong?

​STELTER: ​ It seems like his use of the word indictment and use of the word likely was wrong. And unfortunately, you can't walk back something like that because the damage is already done.

Previously

Fox's Baier Continues To Push Unsubstantiated Clinton Foundation Investigation Claims As Other Networks Debunk

ABC News And NBC News Dispute Fox Anchor Baier’s “Inaccurate” Clinton Foundation Investigation Reporting

Fox’s Bret Baier Walks Back Flawed Reporting About “Likely” Clinton Indictment

Bret Baier Is Serving As A Mouthpiece For Unknown Sources On FBI Stories

We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.