Steve Bannon: “If it's going to be a two-state solution, why not a three-state solution?”
Published
Citation
From the October 10, 2025, edition of Real America's Voice's War Room
STEVE BANNON (HOST): I think — if it's going to be a two-state solution, why not a three-state solution? Why is there not a Christian state?
And I realize you're a Catholic nationalist, as I am. I think you've got to start talking about the architecture — if it's going to be a two-state solution, why do we not have a Christian state that has some official responsibility for the Christian sites? The sites of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Why are we using an intermediary?
If they're gonna have a two-state solution of which we fought for years, but, hey, they brought it on themselves, the Tel Aviv Levin crowd and this. You've got it right there. You see those — you see that Biblical shot? Those people are not leaving.
The two million Palestinians are not leaving, and they're gonna have their own state financed by the Gulf Emirates and secured by an Arab army and the Turks. Okay? That's just reality. That's gonna happen, and it's happening right now.
So if you've got that, Jack Posobiec, why did we not have a Christian state in the Levant that oversees and can protect the Christian sites? If you've got two, why not three?
JACK POSOBIEC (GUEST): Look, Steve, I'm right there with you. I mean, obviously, it would come down to — you'd need some kind of Christian military force.
Look, this has been tried, right? We did this in The Crusades. We did the Kingdom of Jerusalem, you had the European Christians come down and they held the Kingdom of Jerusalem for about 300 years, by the way. And, it was, you know, it was there and it ruled, you know, prior to the Caliphate coming in or after the Caliphate, you know, came in. But, you know, it's something I'd love to see.