Filling in Bush's blanks: The media's pattern of conjuring statements beneficial to the administration Article 04/17/06 2:39 PM EDT
Post ombudsman defended editorial's falsehoods as a difference in “views” Article 04/17/06 12:02 PM EDT
O'Reilly attacked media interest in New Yorker Iran report while ignoring primary reason for that attention -- the Bush administration's reported consideration of tactical nuclear weapons Article 04/14/06 12:11 PM EDT
CNN's Ensor offered defense of Bush's May 2003 bioweapons claim that not even White House has asserted Article 04/13/06 3:59 PM EDT
CNN's Malveaux falsely claimed that McClellan denied that Bush had seen contrary evidence on Iraq weapons labs Article 04/12/06 7:15 PM EDT
Angle, Krauthammer misrepresented Senate intel report to discredit Wilson, defend Libby Article 04/12/06 5:38 PM EDT
NBC's O'Donnell, Shuster falsely suggested Clinton's job approval ratings were low during Lewinsky scandal, impeachment Article 04/12/06 3:06 PM EDT
AP, USA Today uncritically reported Bush's misleading response to question about NIE leak Article 04/11/06 3:54 PM EDT
"[R]are and unusual"? Contrary to Hume's claim, WSJ, Wash. Post editorial pages have often agreed Article 04/11/06 3:53 PM EDT
Kurtz's response to deeply flawed Post editorial: “I don't care what Post editorials say” Article 04/10/06 7:33 PM EDT
Ignoring its own paper and echoing GOP faithful, Wash. Post editorial furthered numerous CIA leak falsehoods Article 04/10/06 7:13 PM EDT
Ignoring Bush administration's past remarks on CIA leak investigation, O'Donnell falsely claimed Bush's “long-standing no-comment policy has held” Article 04/10/06 6:07 PM EDT
