GREG GUTFELD (CO-HOST): Just look at people shooting for the sake of shooting. It's always influenced by the previous attack. So if you thought that you could decrease these attacks by 30%, 40%, 50% why wouldn't you do it? Why wouldn't you do it? The media could do that. We could just report the facts, be one and done and leave, instead of giving just nonstop coverage.
The media, remember, they can decide not to cover something. Hunter's laptop: they were easy with that. Border chaos: they don't cover that. The riots after George Floyd, mostly peaceful: they didn't cover that. Look at the Akron, shooting. They said that they covered the 60 shots from the police but not the fact that the guy shot first. So they know how to not cover things. So it's time that we look at this stuff and decide enough is enough. If we, the press, can decrease these shootings by 30%, why the hell don't we?