Fox News’ Miranda Devine melts down when it’s suggested “hard evidence” is needed to impeach Joe Biden

Devine: “People asking for the smoking gun from James Comer are just being unrealistic”

Video file

Citation From the February 29, 2024, edition Fox News' America Reports

JACQUI HEINRICH (ANCHOR): What I didn't hear from James Comer was any claim that they have something new that would clinch their case. Did you?

MIRANDA DEVINE (GUEST): Well, I mean, Hunter says that he was high or drunk and he sent that WhatsApp message to the wrong person. I mean, there were dozens of WhatsApp messages and he got the $5 million as he'd asked for a few days later. So that doesn't wash.

I mean, I think that, you know, people asking for the smoking gun from James Comer are just being unrealistic or being deliberately -- trying to discredit his inquiry because of course you're not going a find a check made out by Zlochevsky or Vladimir Putin or somebody in Ukraine to Joe Biden. That's not how these things work.


You know, there's just so much evidence. It's kind of ridiculous to hear the Democrats keep this mantra up of "There is no evidence." But unfortunately, that gets carried in a lot of the media as well.

HEINRICH: Well, is it unreasonable to be -- to expect hard evidence, a smoking gun when you're bringing an impeachment? I mean, I think that's what even Comer has said he is hoping to find.

You wrote a headline, an article for "The New York Post" and you take issue with some of the reporting around the FBI informant who was -- who has now had his credibility questioned. Your headline says "FBI informant's flawed rap won't help Hunter Biden in the impeachment probe of family business." This FBI informant, he has been criticized, obviously, his testimony has been criticized and called into question because he's now facing charges over lying.

Basically, folks have been saying that without this, you don't really have the basis for the inquiry because you recall, Democrats threatened to -- excuse me, Republicans threatened to hold the FBI director in contempt to get ahold of the 1023 form in which the allegations were made, but you seem to think that it doesn't matter that he is facing these charges and that this is actually a set-up against him. Is that right?

DEVINE: Yeah, of course it doesn't matter. This is -- this person is described by Democrats dishonestly as a key witness for the impeachment inquiry. He wasn't any kind of witness at all. Jim Comer and Chuck Grassley --

HEINRICH: The FBI director, they threatened to hold the FBI director in contempt to get ahold of this though.

DEVINE: Yes, of course --

HEINRICH: Wouldn't that make him a key witness?

DEVINE: No, of course they -- yes, they did that because they wanted to get the FD-1023 report that he'd filed, which made these bribery allegations against Joe and Hunter Biden and which had been buried by David Weiss and the FBI. It had never been investigated. And that's what Chuck Grassley wanted to be done because he'd been told by an FBI whistleblower that it existed.


I think there's a lot more to come for that story, but it doesn't have any impact on the impeachment inquiry because he wasn't a witness. He wasn't involved. He was just -- all they could do was publicize what he said, but it's now being manipulated by the Democrats into some kind of new Russia hoax that Jamie Raskin is trying to say discredits the entire impeachment inquiry. That ignores the mountains of evidence. You said before there wasn't any hard evidence-- 

HEINRICH: James Comer will have to certainly produce evidence that is outside of the claims made by this informant in order to convince the public --

DEVINE:  He has. That's what I'm trying to tell you.

HEINRICH: -- that this is still warranted.

DEVINE: He's produced mountains, Jacqui.

HEINRICH: Miranda, we're out of time. I appreciate you being here.

DEVINE: Jacqui, he's produced mountains and you're ignoring it.