Conservative Bloggers Can't Decide Who's Getting Softer Press Treatment, Romney Or Gingrich

With signs that the Republican nominating process may take much longer, and become much more contentious, than once thought, fault lines are beginning to appear within the conservative media, which has traditionally been very disciplined in their messaging.

What's confusing though, is watching conservative bloggers, who traditionally bash the press for being unfair to Republicans, suddenly claiming the press is being too nice (too fair?) to certain GOP hopefuls.

Last week, Andrew Breitbart's editorial panel at Big Journalism, claiming to have spotted a long-term press conspiracy, lashed out at the mainstream media for giving Mitt Romney a free ride prior to his possible nomination:

John McCain's Romney oppo file makes its way to the Internet. Will the media now begin to talk about some of the troubling things in Romney's record, or will they “Obama him” and allow a candidate to skate through the primary with little vetting -- except what the candidates can push through before they're jumped on and called “mean?” The media doesn't want to vet Romney now; they're holding their fire in the event he becomes the nominee, after which they will unload.

This week, conservative Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin, who has been forceful in her support of Romney, lashed out at the mainstream media for giving Newt Gingrich a free ride while supposedly “grilling” Romney with “enthusiasm”:

The key question for tonight's debate is whether the NBC moderators will serve up more hanging curveballs over the plate for Newt Gingrich to bash out of the park or whether they will actually scrutinize him with the same enthusiasm they have shown in grilling Mitt Romney.

There's something surreal in watching conservatives complain the press is being too nice to a Republican candidate during primary season.