Krauthammer's illegitimate lame-duck argument


Charles Krauthammer issued a stern warning to Democrats tonight: "Of course a lame-duck Congress has the legal authority to do anything it wants, but it's illegitimate." Krauthammer explained:

It's a superannuated body. The people spoke on election day. They threw the Democrats out of the House. And yet this lame-duck session is still run by Democrats. A lame-duck session ought to be used only for doing the business of the country that has to be done. For example extending--having a continuing resolution which would allow the government to actually continue into next week and beyond, do the tax rates, and then stop. I think Republicans ought to argue on principle. The country has delivered a verdict. It elected a new kind of Congress, and it ought to be making the decisions on how the country goes.

Got it? Lame-duck sessions are illegitimate. The people have spoken.

It bears repeating that in 1998 Krauthammer urged Republicans to use a lame-duck session to impeach President Clinton - this just weeks after Krauthammer wrote that Republicans had lost seats that year in part over voter discontent with the GOP effort to impeach Clinton.

We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.