Andrew Malcolm, please define "significant." And "and."

Andrew Malcolm, please define "significant." And "and."

Blog ››› ››› JAMISON FOSER

Los Angeles Times blogger/former Bush flack Andrew Malcolm writes:

We already knew that BP and its folks were significant contributors to the record $750-million war chest of Barack Obama's 2007-08 campaign.

That's right, if by "BP and its folks," Malcolm means "BP's folks, but not BP." See, Obama got $71,000 in contributions from BP employees, but didn't take a dime from the company (corporate contributions to federal candidates are prohibited) or its PAC (Obama didn't take PAC money.)

Oh, and if by "significant contributors," Malcolm means "one one-hundredth of one percent of Obama's campaign cash." To put that in context: Let's say Andrew Malcolm makes $100,000 a year. One one-hundredth of one precent of his income would be $10. That's how "significant" BP employee contributions to Obama were: They accounted for about ten bucks out out of every $100,000 Obama raised.

So, basically, Malcolm's description is complete bunk. Again.

(Later in the post, Malcolm peddled a remarkably inane conspiracy theory about Rahm Emanuel, Rosa DeLauro's house, and BP. Matt Gertz has already dealt with that nonsense.)

Los Angeles Times
Andrew Malcolm
We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.