After criticizing Obama's lack of passion, Howard Kurtz criticizes Obama's passion

Blog ››› ››› JAMISON FOSER

Maybe we should start calling Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz "Goldilocks":

Howard Kurtz, June 2: "I'm among those who believe that passion is often missing from his presidency. … But in terms of the optics, the politics, the sense of outrage, well, no wonder James Carville was angry. The White House just bungled that part. … Watching Obama, I thought, here's a guy who really understands this stuff. But he was flat and technocratic."

Howard Kurtz, June 7, 12:52 PM: "It's mostly pundits who are indicting the president for insufficient anger, and I would agree that he can seem awfully calm, even passive, in the face of a national calamity such as the oil spill."

Howard Kurtz, June 7, approximately 8:30 PM: "Obama, talking to Matt Lauer about kicking ass? Doesn't it sound like something the press shop scripted for him? Next: Boxing gloves video?"

President Obama just can't win with this guy, can he?

The Washington Post
Howard Kurtz
We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.