NOW calls Givhan's Kagan attack "sexist," WMC hits WaPost writer's "narrow-minded analysis"

NOW calls Givhan's Kagan attack "sexist," WMC hits WaPost writer's "narrow-minded analysis"

Blog ››› ››› KARL FRISCH

Major national advocates for women are pushing back hard against the Washington Post's Robin Givhan who attacked Elena Kagan last week for being "dowdy" while obsessing over her own observation that the Supreme Court nominee "doesn't appear to ever cross her legs."

National Organization for Women (NOW) -- the nation's "largest organization of feminist activists" -- says Givhan's column was "sexist" and that the conversation over Kagan's nomination should "move on to the substance of her views."

In a statement provided to Media Matters, NOW's action vice president Erin Matson said:

There are a number of questions we should ask when, in 2010, it is considered remarkable for a woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court. But does she cross her legs? Dress like a lady? Give me a break.

It's common sense that calling Elena Kagan frumpy or dowdy is sexist. Same goes with sensationalizing the way she sits in a chair. Let's move on to the substance of her views.

Similarly, Jehmu Greene -- president of the Women's Media Center (WMC), which strives to make "women visible and powerful in the media" -- chided Givhan for her "narrow-minded analysis" in a post on the WMC's blog.

Even after Media Matters went to great lengths disproving the vapid musings of Givhan by offering up a variety of photos showing Kagan meeting with Senators and President Obama with her legs crossed, the Post writer stood by her false attacks.

Related:

Posted In
Diversity & Discrimination, Gender
Network/Outlet
The Washington Post
Person
Robin Givhan
Stories/Interests
Supreme Court Nominations, Elena Kagan
We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.