CNN's Levs explains: "a simple majority of 51 votes" is "actually not" the "nuclear option"


From the August 19 edition of CNN's Newsroom:

Loading the player reg...

LEVS: So, the theory here is, if they cannot get those 60 votes they would usually need to break a filibuster, there's this whole other way to circumvent it and say, you know what? Let's not even worry about it. Let's use that reconciliation, get a simple majority of 51 votes, potentially pass the bill.

GRIFFIN: Josh, is that the nuclear option --

LEVS: It's actually --

GRIFFIN: -- we've heard about that in the past?

LEVS: It's actually not. Right, we've heard the "nuclear option" term used, and that was used in the context of trying to get through some judicial nominees against a filibuster. In a way, it's a similar concept, but we're not talking about that term here. That's not the term that we're -- that's being used. Instead, it's about this specific thing, a reconciliation, that got inside that 2010 budget. [CNN's Newsroom 8/19/09]


CNN joins Fox News in falsely comparing reconciliation process to "nuclear option"

Posted In
Government, The Senate, Health Care, Health Care Reform
CNN Newsroom
We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.