Hayes claims "everybody, with unanimity" in media calls EITs "torture" -- not NY Times, according to public editor


From the June 21 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday:

Loading the player reg...

From New York Times public editor Clark Hoyt's April 25 column:

And why not, then, go all the way to torture? [Times editor in the Washington bureau, Douglas] Jehl said that when the paper is discussing what is generally regarded as the most extreme interrogation method the C.I.A. used, waterboarding, "we've become more explicit in saying in a first reference that it's a near-drowning technique" that Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and many other experts "have called torture." But he said: "I have resisted using torture without qualification or to describe all the techniques. Exactly what constitutes torture continues to be a matter of debate and hasn't been resolved by a court. This president and this attorney general say waterboarding is torture, but the previous president and attorney general said it is not. On what basis should a newspaper render its own verdict, short of charges being filed or a legal judgment rendered?" Jehl argued for precision and caution. I agree.

Posted In
Justice & Civil Liberties, Interrogation
FOX Broadcasting Company
Stephen F. Hayes
FOX News Sunday
We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.