<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Reproductive Choice</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/reproductive_choice</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Reproductive Choice</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Coulter, Limbaugh smeared Obama with false claim that he &#x22;believes it is proper to kill a baby that has survived an abortion&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808200007</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh stated that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;believes it is proper to kill a baby that has survived an abortion&#x22; and Ann Coulter said that Obama &#x22;wants the doctors ... chasing it through the delivery room to make sure it gets killed.&#x22; They based their claims on Obama&#x27;s opposition to an Illinois bill that he and other opponents said posed a threat to abortion rights and was unnecessary. Indeed, the Illinois Department of Public Health reportedly said that conduct alleged by proponents of the bill, if it had occurred, would have violated then-existing law.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808200007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:37:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Touting Corsi book, Limbaugh falsely claimed that Obama voted to &#x22;allow doctors and patients to murder babies&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150013</link>
<description>Discussing Jerome Corsi&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Obama Nation&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Rush Limbaugh falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;numerous times, three times in Illinois voted for legislation that would allow doctors and patients to murder babies who survived abortions and were out of the womb. Radical stuff. Three times he voted for this.&#x22; Limbaugh misrepresented the legislation Obama voted against, a bill that amended the Illinois Abortion Law of 1975 and that opponents said was unnecessary, as the Illinois criminal code unequivocally prohibits killing children, and posed a threat to abortion rights.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:56:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly: &#x22;Birth control is not a medical condition, it is a choice&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807200002</link>
<description>Discussing the issue of whether health insurance plans that cover Viagra should also cover birth control, Fox News&#x27; Bill O&#x27;Reilly asserted: &#x22;Viagra is used to help a medical condition -- that&#x27;s why it&#x27;s covered. Birth control is not a medical condition, it is a choice.&#x22; But O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s assertion is contradicted by professional medical associations that have stated that pregnancy is a medical condition and that &#x22;[c]ontraception is medically necessary&#x22; for women.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807200002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:44:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews said, &#x22;I don&#x27;t hear Democrats talk ... about the need to reduce the number of abortions,&#x22; but they do, often, and on his show  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160006</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Chris Matthews asserted, &#x22;I don&#x27;t hear Democrats talk ... about the need to reduce the number of abortions.&#x22; He continued: &#x22;[Y]ou don&#x27;t hear them talking a lot about the need for education, for much fewer, maybe enormously fewer, unwanted pregnancies, which is the reason people get abortions.&#x22; In fact, Sen. Barack Obama said in April, &#x22;[W]e should be doing everything we can to avoid unwanted pregnancies that might even lead somebody to consider having an abortion.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:28:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gannett, AP claimed McCain opposes a constitutional amendment banning abortion -- but McCain said he supports it  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090011</link>
<description>In recent comparisons of Barack Obama&#x27;s and John McCain&#x27;s positions, Gannett News Service and the Associated Press claimed that McCain opposes a constitutional amendment banning abortion. However, McCain has previously asserted that he supports such an amendment, and McCain advisers have reportedly said that he would not try to change the Republican Party&#x27;s platform on abortion, which in 2004 called for a constitutional ban on abortion.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090011</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:22:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Post&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Balz asserted Giuliani &#x22;[a]t odds&#x22; with GOP &#x22;on abortion, guns and gays,&#x22; despite moving to the right on those issues</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712160002</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article by Dan Balz described Rudy Giuliani
as &#x22;[a]t odds with the majority of his party on abortion, guns and
gays,&#x22; but failed to note that Giuliani has shifted his position on these
issues, moving toward more conservative stances on them, since launching his
campaign for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712160002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:13:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George Will: GOP  voters &#x22;have learned&#x22; that Giuliani &#x22;doesn&#x27;t flip-flop&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710140004</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s George Will asserted 
&#x22;What they [Republican primary voters] have learned about Giuliani is that he 
doesn&#x27;t flip-flop. ... [H]e&#x27;s taken exactly the un-Romney approach to his problem, 
which was to say, &#x27;Look, this is me. Take it or leave it.&#x27; &#x22; But as NPR senior 
news analyst Cokie Roberts said, &#x22;[H]e equivocated on guns. He equivocated on 
abortion.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710140004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:42:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gerson falsely claimed Clinton said Catholics &#x22;somehow responsible for abortion in America&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:17:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s  King reported  social conservative  support for Thompson, but not his inconsistent abortion  stance</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:51:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media reported McCain claim of consistency on abortion, ignored history of waffling</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705170001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705170001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Following a pattern, CNN&#x27;s John King equated &#x22;mixing God and politics&#x22; and opposition to abortion rights</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:16:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; uncritically report Giuliani assertion that 2003 and 1997 abortion ban exceptions were substantively different</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:00:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NBC News producer uncritically gives Giuliani campaign&#x27;s explanation for inconsistency on abortion</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704230005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704230005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:28:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;again ignored Giuliani&#x27;s shifting position on abortion ban</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704190005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704190005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:02:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reports by &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times,&#x3C;/em&#x3E; others on Giuliani reaction to abortion decision did not mention apparent flip-flop</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704180008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704180008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:44:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>