Canada Free Press

Tags ››› Canada Free Press
  • How The Industry-Backed Reports Attacking EPA's Climate Plan Create A False Media Echo Chamber

    Oil Front Group Uses Misleading Statistics To Claim Acting On Climate Change Will Kill Thousands

    Blog ››› ››› DENISE ROBBINS

    It seems like a different study attacking the EPA's Clean Power Plan pops up in the media every other week. But many of these studies are riddled with flaws and funded by fossil fuel interests, so media should think twice before repeating their claims.

    A new briefing from the Energy & Policy Institute (EPI) detailed the fossil fuel funding and methodological flaws of six reports attacking the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) carbon pollution standards. One of them, a study from NERA Economic Consulting, has been thoroughly debunked by multiple experts, who say the report is completely out of date, uses faulty efficiency cost assumptions and outdated renewable energy cost assumptions, and does not acknowledge any of the EPA plan's economic benefits, rendering its findings irrelevant.

    The deeply flawed NERA study also forms the basis for a new analysis from the Institute for Energy Research (IER) (not included in EPI's briefing), which concluded that the Clean Power Plan will result in 14,000 premature deaths. IER's analysis led to horrific (and completely false) headlines like this, from the conservative news site Daily Caller:

    Daily Caller

    To arrive at their conclusion, IER used NERA's GDP loss estimate and converted it directly into increased premature deaths. However, using that method doesn't make much sense, as NERA failed to acknowledge the Clean Power Plan's projected life-saving health and economic benefits. Thankfully, IER's conclusion has so far been confined to the conservative media fringe.

    However, numerous groups have touted the public health benefits of pollution standards, and the EPA estimates that its plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants would prevent 2,700 to 6,600 premature deaths and 140,000 to 150,000 asthma attacks in children. So how does IER's analysis arrive at such a drastically different conclusion? A look at the chain of fossil fuel-funding behind IER and the NERA study may provide the answer.

    The cover page of the NERA study states that it was prepared for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, the Association of American Railroads, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, Consumer Energy Alliance, and the National Mining Association. Combined, they're a who's who of fossil fuel industry trade groups and advocacy organizations. EPI put together a graphic showing many of the coal and oil companies that comprise these groups:

    As for IER, the group lists former Koch lobbyist Thomas Pyle as its president and is partly funded by the oil billionaire Koch brothers and their political network. IER has also received funding from Exxon Mobil, the American Petroleum Institute, and the Koch-backed DonorsTrust and Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation.

    The other reports detailed in EPI's briefing include one from the National Black Chamber of Commerce, another from the Beacon Hill Institute, two from Energy Ventures Analysis (one of which was funded directly by coal giant Peabody Energy), and one from IER. These reports are often publicized through coordinated media campaigns and newspaper op-eds across the country.

    EPI's report illustrates how multiple industry-funded studies work in concert to simulate a chorus of diverse voices attacking the EPA's flagship climate plan. But really, it's just the industry protecting its bottom line.

    Image at top via Flickr user Fintrvlr using a Creative Commons License.

  • Canada Free Press Editor Promoted By Limbaugh Also Suggested Mafia Is Behind 9-11

    Blog ››› ››› TERRY KREPEL

    On his September 30 radio show, Rush Limbaugh approvingly read a column from the website Canada Free Press in which the writer, Judi McLeod, claimed that President Obama -- whom she identified as "Barry Soetoro" -- was considering suspending the 2012 elections because "only suspended elections would guarantee his re-election." Limbaugh said he found McLeod's claim's "fascinating," adding, "You don't think these people would suspend elections if they could get away with it?"

    So, who is Judi McLeod, editor and owner of Canada Free Press, who claims that her work "has appeared on Rush Limbaugh,, Drudge Report,, and Glenn Beck"? Turns out she's a hard-core birther who has also suggested that the Mafia was behind the 9-11 attacks.

    McLeod stated in her Limbaugh-endorsed column that "Obama and his masters already pulled the biggest scam on any country in modern times by making it to the White House without legitimate I.D." That's just the beginning of McLeod's Obama derangement: