Fox Nation is again promoting the Tea Party Express:
This post is blank except for a link to the website for the Tea Party Express III:
Earlier today, the Associated Press published an article on the resignation of Yvo de Boer, the United Nations' top climate change official. It's an interesting story, and the AP, as is their wont, presented it in a just-the-facts fashion:
De Boer is known to be deeply disappointed with outcome of the last summit in Copenhagen, which drew 120 world leaders but failed to reach more than a vague promise by several countries to limit carbon emissions - and even that deal fell short of consensus.
But he denied to the AP that his decision to quit was a result of frustration with Copenhagen.
"Copenhagen wasn't what I had hoped it would be," he acknowledged, but the summit nonetheless prompted governments to submit plans and targets for reining in the emissions primarily blamed for global warming. "I think that's a pretty solid foundation for the global response that many are looking for," he said.
De Boer told the AP he believes talks "are on track," although it was uncertain that a full treaty could be finalized at the next high-level conference in November.
The partial agreement reached in Copenhagen, brokered by President Barack Obama, "was very significant," he said. But he acknowledged frustration that the deal was merely "noted" rather than formally adopted by all countries.
For Fox News, however, news isn't news unless it is a) conservative, and b) wrong, so they added a little language to the AP report without acknowledging that they had done so (the byline reads simply "AP"). Compare the original AP article above to this screenshot of the Fox News version (emphasis added):
Fox News' additions, of course, are little more than stale retreads of the many falsehoods that comprise the "Climate-gate scandal." And the "bombshell" they refer to is actually a distortion of climate scientist Phil Jones' interview with the BBC, in which he said that it would be unlikely to observe a statistically significant trend over a 15 year interval, which, when it comes to climate science, is a very short period of time.
If you are watching the 2010 CPAC conference live on CSPAN, share your thoughts and join in the discussion in the comments section of this open thread. Don't forget, you can read our ongoing live coverage or follow Media Matters on Twitter @mmfa.
Also, if you happen to be attending CPAC in Washington, DC and want to send us a tip on something you've seen or perhaps some photos or video, you can email us at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can also follow me as I tweet about CPAC on Twitter @KarlFrisch.
Commenting on CPAC, National Review Online editor Kathryn Jean Lopez wrote:
Commenting on a CPAC speech by Marco Rubio, who is running for the Republican nomination for Florida's U.S. Senate seat, National Review Online editor Kathryn Jean Lopez wrote:
With Stephen Baldwin, star of NBC's I'm a Celebrity, Get me out of Here and other theatrical gems, now on stage at the annual CPAC gathering here in Washington, I thought it might be as good a time as any to provide everyone with an idea of what to expect from this year's gathering of conservatives, birthers and Birchers. Here's just a sampling of CPAC content from years past:
The Daily Beast has unveiled its list of "The Left's Top 25 Journalists" -- with Washington Post editorial page editor Fred Hiatt coming in at number 5, despite the fact that "many on the left would question Hiatt's presence on this list" because "his near-neocon position on foreign policy enrages the left-wing blogosphere."
Seriously? The fifth-most influential liberal journalist in America is a neocon? Who came up with this list, Dick Cheney?
No, actually, it was Tunku Varadarajan, formerly op-ed editor for the Wall Street Journal (whose opinion pages are notoriously conservative) and currently a fellow at the right-wing Hoover Institution, where the fellows program is generously funded by Richard Mellon Scaife.
I know what you're thinking: If The Daily Beast turned to a Scaife-funded right-winger to pen its list of "The Left's Top 25 Journalists," it probably used a Soros-backed liberal to assess journalism's leading conservatives, right? Nope, that was Varadarajan, too.
Varadarajan also wrote Forbes magazine's recent list of "The 25 Most Influential Liberals In The U.S. Media." Fred Hiatt came in at number 3 on that list, with Clinton-hating, liberal-bashing Chris Matthews at number 12.
I listened intently to the first five minutes of the 2010 Conservative Political Action Conference, as Cleta Mitchell of the American Conservative Union introduced her boss, CPAC chair David Keane.
Here's a list* of the words I heard in those five minutes:
*List not modified for comedic effect.
As I've been noting for weeks now, much of the Beltway press corps refuses to put today's Republican obstructionism in any kind of historical context. Pundits and reporters watch the GOP universally reject virtually every White House initiative and the press pretends it's normal. That's how the game has always been played, goes the narrative.
Not true. The Beltway game has never been played the way it's unfolded under Obama.
Proof? Behold, The National Journal from July 14, 2001. (No link found.) This is how president Bush, who needed a partisan Supreme Court to seat him in office, was greeted by Democrats who ran Congress at the time:
President Bush was worried. The House committee handling his
education bill was scheduled to vote on it in a few days, and
conservative support for the measure was slipping. But Bush knew
just whom to call.
Yes, the California liberal and ranking Democrat on the
House Education and the Workforce Committee.
"I can deliver," Miller told him.
Bush has been able to count on Miller ever since their
first meeting in December, when Bush, as President-elect, invited
a group of Democrats and Republicans down to Austin to talk
education. "There was a chemistry here that worked," Miller says.
Bush and Miller became fast friends after discussing the
importance of measuring student results and demanding that
schools show academic improvement in exchange for federal
Throughout the meeting, Bush and Miller traded
verbal towel snaps. Miller could easily be mistaken for an
offensive lineman, and Bush quickly dubbed him "Big George." In
the ensuing months, they talked frequently. "I think we had a
comfort level with one another where I could level with him, and
he could level with me," Miller says.
Miller delivered the Democratic votes that Bush needed.
That's how the game has been played for generations inside the Beltway. What we're witinessing today has no precedent in modern American politics. It's just that the press doesn't like to say that out loud.
Like lots of news outlets, the AP is using the retirement announcement from Sen. Evan Bayh to do lots of hand-wringing about he absence of Congressional moderates and to bemoan the lack of bipartisanship cooperation inside the Beltway.
But oh my gosh, look at the all the things the AP article forgets to mention in it's sad tale about lack of across-the-isle cooperation, as the article leaves the unmistakable impression that both sides are equally to blame for the stalemate. The AP forgets to mention that in last year's key White House legislative initiatives, the Republican Party has essentially voted en mass against the Obama administration.
Unlike when the new Republican president, Reagan, Bush and Bush arrived in the White House and were able to find scores of Democrats willing to hlep them pass bills, Obama has been met with a virtual stonewall; an obstructionist stonewall that has no precedent in modern American politics.
But oops, the AP forgets to mention any of that context and history in its sad tale about Dems and GOP not working together.
And oh yeah, the AP forgets to mention the run-away (and historic) number of cloture votes that Republicans have forced upon the Congress last year; more cloture votes to break filibusters than Congress faced during the entire 1950's and 1960's combined.
The Beltway press corps loves to whine the lack of bipartisan cooperation. It also loves to play dumb about why that is.
UPDATED: NPR does the exact same thing with its long look at the rise of partisanship. Conclusion: Both sides are to blame for today's stalemate.
What's never mentioned? The historic number of GOP fillibusters.
UPDATED: And three makes a trend. WashPost's David Broder checks in today with his hand-wring, both-sides-are-to-blame column and (surprise!) never mentions the historic number of GOP filibusters.
UPDATED: Credit to McClatchy Newspapers' David Lightman for simply spelling out what's going on:
Senate Republicans are using the filibuster to limit and often derail Democrats' initiatives, paralyzing the Senate and making it nearly impossible to accomplish even the most routine matters.
Honestly AP, NPR, and WashPost, is that really so difficult?