Is health care reform constitutional? Let's ask a right-wing lawyer!

Blog ››› ››› JAMISON FOSER

With Republican politicians and conservative activists increasingly claiming in recent days that health care reform is unconstitutional, the Washington Post published a Outlook piece yesterday purporting to examine the question. Under the header "Is health-care reform constitutional," Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett offered a "guide to the possible legal challenges to a comprehensive health-care bill. " Barnett's "guide" must surely hearten Republicans: Again and again, Barnett offered arguments against the bill's constitutionality, while omitting arguments that it is constitutional.

Today, the Post hosted Barnett for an online Q&A about the constitutionality of health care reform.

Opinion columnists, of course, are free to pick and choose facts to make their arguments, within reason. And constitutional law is not arithmetic; Barnett is under no obligation to agree with other lawyers, or even court decisions. But Barnett's piece was not presented to Post readers as an argument; it was presented as a "guide to the possible legal challenges" to health care reform. And he was identified simply as a Georgetown law professor. All of that suggests that Barnett is a neutral observer, and his piece is a dispassionate, balanced assessment of the constitutionality of reform.

In fact, Barnett is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and the Goldwater Institute, a member of the Federalist Society, and authored a paper for the Heritage Foundation arguing that health care reform is unconstitutional. The Post mentioned none of that.

And, in a reminder of the paper's recent solicitation of a column attacking liberals as condescending, it turns out that Barnett didn't have pitch his column to the Post -- he was "invited" to write it.

Posted In
Health Care, Health Care Reform
The Washington Post
We've changed our commenting system to Disqus.
Instructions for signing up and claiming your comment history are located here.
Updated rules for commenting are here.